Independent and full-scope, with the audits published so you can check the work before you ask.
On this page
I am a freelance SEO consultant in India, based in Chennai and working remotely with brands across the country and abroad.
The work is full-scope: a crawler report is one input, and the job is connecting what is technically wrong with a site to what the business is trying to sell.
The 8 published engagements cover D2C food e-commerce, a B2B telecom provider, a financial advisory firm, a B2B software company in renewable energy, a design-led e-commerce brand, a web development studio, an events business and my own agency. Every client is described by sector only.
A package prices the work before anyone has looked at the site. The sites in my case studies ranged from under ten pages to about 175, on WordPress, Wix, React and hand-coded HTML, and needed very different things.
So the order is reversed. The first three to five findings are free. If you want more after that, the scope follows from what they show.
Ask to see a real audit, and check one finding yourself. Ask what they withdrew before sending it: across my 8 engagements, 16 first-draft findings did not survive checking. And be wary of anyone promising a ranking or a traffic figure.
Real engagements, described by sector only. Each includes the report and the workbook.
Full technical, content, schema and AI-search audit, then two re-audits to track what the client's team fixed, followed by keyword research and a competitor gap analysis.
Four first-draft claims were withdrawn or corrected before the report was released — including two 'duplicate product' pairs that had only been inferred from similar-looking URLs.
Audit delivered, then re-audited twice.
Technical SEO audit plus a content-accuracy review, turned into a plain-language client report and a call brief for walking the client through it.
An automated scan flagged the opening-hours schema as malformed. It was the format the specification requires, and it was rejected before the report went out.
Audit delivered; implementation not recorded.
Full-site technical audit, then an organic growth plan and a topical-authority cluster architecture, with a forecast model built on leading indicators rather than invented targets.
Three automated warnings were rejected before publishing — including a 'duplicate title on every page' that turned out to be the titles inside SVG icons.
Audit delivered; no live-site changes recorded.
Prices are not published on this site yet. Start with the free findings; if you want more after that, the quote is for the scope those findings show, not a package.
No. AI answers are assembled from pages a crawler could reach and understand, so the same groundwork decides whether a model has your version to draw on. What changed is that there is now a second place to be found, and it is measured separately from rankings.
I do not publish a rate card yet, and I would be wary of any page that quotes a price before seeing your site. What costs nothing is the first step: three to five verified findings, free. A quote follows only if you ask for one.
Send a URL. Three to five verified findings come back within two working days, free, with no call required.
Ask my AI
Answers from notes I wrote. It shows its sources and says when it does not know.
Ask about the case studies, how I would approach your site, or what actually goes into an audit. Every answer shows the note it came from.
AI-generated from my own notes. Verify anything that matters.